Dulwich Picture Gallery, London: reframing Allori
by The Frame Blog
The Dulwich Picture Gallery owns a small and beautiful version of Cristofano Allori’s Judith, which has languished for some time in a most unsuitable frame. In an act of dramatic imagination which rivals the Baroque richness of the composition, it has been recently reframed in a setting which has brought it magically alive.
Cristofani Allori (attrib.; 1577-1621), Judith, o/copper, 30.5 x 24.2 cm., Dulwich Picture Gallery
This is one of several versions of Allori’s Judith, which came by bequest to the Dulwich Picture Gallery in 1811, as part of its original collection of 370 paintings amassed by the art dealers Francis Bourgeois and Noël Desenfans.
Paul Sandby, Francis Bourgeois and Noel Desenfans, c.1805, watercolour on paper 14.3 x 15.3 cm, DPG645. By Permission of the Trustees of Dulwich Picture Gallery, London
This collection had been put together at the bidding of King Stanislaus of Poland between 1790 and 1795, at which point the king was forced to abdicate, leaving the two dealers with a large number of important and very high quality paintings, mainly – like the Allori – late Mannerist or Baroque in style. They were unable to sell the collection as a whole, and after the death of Desenfans in 1807, Sir Francis left it – via Desenfans’s widow – to Dulwich College (which already owned two earlier bequests), on condition that it should be opened to the public.
Cristofano Allori (1577-1621), Judith with the head of Holofernes, s & d 1613, o/c, 120.4 x 100.3 cm, RCIN 404989, Royal Collection Trust/© Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2016
There is an original, early Judith by Allori in the Royal Collection, which was probably acquired by Charles I as part of the Mantua collection; it is framed in a Baroque British pattern, with a centred, gadrooned top edge. Xavier Bray has noted that the present painting is of such quality that it may be a quarter-size autograph version of this work.
Cristofano Allori, Judith, 1610-20, 54.7 x 45.7 in. (139 x 116cm.), Palazzo Pitti
There is also a more idealized Judith from Allori’s hand in the Palazzo Pitti in a Baroque bunched-leaf frame (above) , a slightly larger copy after it in the Rijksmusem, and one attributed to Allori in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin; as well as copies elsewhere – in the Liechtenstein Collection; in the Uffizi; the Vatican; the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna; Nottingham Castle; and Tabley House, Cheshire (another smallish version).
Cristofano Allori (after), Judith holding the head of Holofernes, 66 x 53 cm. Lawrences Auctioneers of Crewkerne
Other copies can be found on the art market; above, in a ‘Medici’ style frame, and here, in a Baroque shell frame.
Most of these are framed, like the two examples illustrated above, in carved giltwood settings, but then most of them are larger – sometimes very much larger – than the Dulwich Judith, and are presented to make the maximum impact in the collectors’ galleries of which they were once part, and the interiors – the museums and/or regal collections – which they now inhabit. It is interesting to speculate how the Dulwich painting (which is only a foot high) would have been framed originally, or even how it was displayed when it entered the collection in the early 19th century. Paintings on copper are, certainly not always, but frequently, displayed in ebony frames, which offset the very pure enamel-like effect of the colours lent by the support; see for example, an entry in an inventory of 1688 at Burghley House, Lincolnshire:
‘My Ladys Closett… 4 pictures on Copper in Ebbony frames (viz) a St Stephen, a St Laurence, an Appollo & Midas, Appollo fleying a Satir by phillipa Laura’ .
And in 1679 in the Green Closet in Ham House, a cabinet decorated with small paintings, there were
’14 pictures with gilt frames, 38 in black ebony and one with a round carved frame’ ;
these included paintings on slate and on copper.
James Stephanoff, Viewing at Dulwich Picture Gallery, watercolour, c.1830, Dulwich Picture Gallery
The Dulwich Judith may also have had an ebony frame at some point; although a painting of the interior of the Gallery in 1830 shows frames which, although by no means uniform, are also by no means other than gilded, ornamented, and mostly contemporary.
Veronese (1528-88), St Jerome & a donor, c.1563, 224.5 x 120 cm., Dulwich Picture Gallery, Bourgeois Bequest, 1811. Photo: Rex Harris
These are, in many cases, the frames still remaining on the paintings; Veronese’s St Jerome can be seen on the left of James Stephanoff’s Viewing at Dulwich Picture Gallery, in its Louis XV revival frame.
Sisto Badalocchio (1585-post 1621, Christ carried to the tomb, c.1607, 47.6 x 38.4 cm., Dulwich Picture Gallery, Bourgeois Bequest, 1811
Other paintings in the Bourgeois collection have Regency frames with concave profiles and acanthus-&-shell corners, very much in the style of patterns produced by John Smith, framemaker to Georges III and IV . The example above, on a relatively small painting, may indicate that the Allori Judith could have been framed in a similar style. It is not inconceivable that, as part of Sir John Soane’s reconstruction of the Gallery between 1812-14 to meet the terms of Bourgeois’s bequest, many of the paintings were reframed for display in a number of variations on a gallery-style of frame, and that John Smith might have been chosen for this prestigious task (although he was also an expensive choice, and Soane had striven to keep his own costs down).
Cristofani Allori (attrib.; 1577-1621), Judith, o/copper, 30.5 x 24.2 cm., Dulwich Picture Gallery
Whatever its past history of presentation, the Judith has been entombed for some time in an extremely unattractive plain linear moulding, with machined regularity and a plasticky black-painted finish, which did nothing to show off the remarkable dynamism of the composition. It also covered the painting by around 5mm. on each side. Dr Xavier Bray, who was until mid-2016 Chief Curator of the Dulwich Picture Gallery (and since then Director of the Wallace Collection), wished ‘to give the painting more significance in the hang’, and approached Peter Schade.
Three options were suggested, of frames which were regionally and historically appropriate for Allori’s work:
First, a 17th century Baroque bolection frame, with raked and centred acanthus leaves clasped over the top moulding, painted and parcel-gilt. The radiating effect produced by the leaves emphasizes the composition, leading the eye inward and enhancing the shallow space in which the figures stand, whilst the gilding gives animation and variety, opening up the picture, where the plain black moulding flattened and deadened it. The bolection profile acts, as all such Baroque mouldings do, to push the painting outward from the wall, giving it greater presence and authority.
The second option was another bolection frame, with a profile formed of a sophisticated pattern of stepped convex and small cavetto mouldings, made of stained, polished and painted walnut. Here, the parallel lines of the mouldings form a perspectival tunnel, which seems optically to recede towards the painting rather than pushing it outward. This use of inset and projecting surfaces, which create exaggerated effects of light and shadow, is characteristic of Baroque architecture; this frame mimics on a tiny scale the movement and drama generated by the façade of a 17th century cathedral, and echoes the theatricality of Allori’s brilliantly-spotlit scene.
The third choice was another bolection profile, veneered between ebony trims with strips of tortoiseshell, which were probably laid over gilded wood to achieve such a light tone and bright amber colouring. This frame had many of the advantages of both the others, but its bright register overwhelmed the artist’s succulent use of saturated colour; and although it effectively isolated the painting from the wall it hung on, it also took away some of the intense theatricality and opulence from the painting.
There was one final and idiosyncratic option – a small 17th century Florentine frame, boldly carved with a bay-leaf garland between scrolling concave rails, centred with primitive pierced mascarons, and finished with fleur-de-lys corners.
This might seem a counter-intuitive choice for a painting so detailed and miniaturist in its technique, but the contrast of large, roughly-blocked forms and equally unrefined gilding provided the perfect foil for the panel. The design reflects the influence of the ‘Sansovino’ style, which appeared in Tuscany as well as the Veneto, and is therefore appropriate for the work of a late Mannerist Florentine artist. The motifs which decorate it are also fortuitously suitable: the bay-leaf garland underlines Judith’s victory over the enemy general, Holofernes; the fleur-de-lys is the emblem of Florence, and the mascarons, like sinister bird masks, emphasize the horror of a scene which the enamelled style of Allori’s work partly disguises. The painted and parcel-gilt finish had acquired a soft and aged patina which was much less overwhelming for the painting, than, for example, the tortoiseshell frame. In a final happy touch, the panel dropped into the frame, exactly fitting it. More of the sword was revealed, at the left; the maidservant’s hand appeared on the right; and rather more of Holofernes’s couch could be seen. These additions set the composition more comfortably back into the frame, allowing a better relationship with the spectator.
Before reframing: Allori’s Judith in previous modern black frame. Still taken from Google Art virtual tour of Dulwich Picture Gallery
The result can be seen in the partial new hanging of the wall where the Allori lives.
After reframing: Allori’s Judith in 17th century Baroque frame
The painting which previously seemed like an afterthought on the outskirts of strangely-composed grouping now shines out at eye-level, its frame relating happily to the Murillos on either side of it, and itself given so much more importance and prominence by this bold and dramatic act of reframing.
With thanks to Peter Schade and Dr Xavier Bray
 John Somerville, Jon Culverhouse & Miranda Beck, Burghley: a guide to the paintings, 2016, p. 6. The Filippo Lauri Martyrdom of St Lawrence (in the Ante Chapel at Burghley) has since been transferred to an ornamental gilt frame.
 Jacob Simon, Picture frames at Ham House, National Trust, 2014, p. 11
 See The clue is in the frame for more on John Smith
Without question, this was the best choice for the image. I like the acanthus bolection frame almost as well, but comparing the two, the Florentine frame really brings the painting out so well. The colors of the frame do not compete with the image, and the strength of the ornament complements it perfectly. Great tale of the choices that must be made to make the work as present as possible.
Lynn, what a terrific article. Thanks for going through all of Peter’s myriad of design considerations, style, detailed molding shape descriptions, luminosity,construction details,
historical considerations and finally placement in context of where it hangs. A brilliant glimpse
Into the thought processes that should set the standards for all reframing projects.
Dear Bill –
Thank you for such a kind comment! – it was such an outstanding and intriguing solution to the problem that I really thought it deserved to be recorded, and I hoped that people might be as interested in it as I was. How nice of you to take the time to respond –
With best wishes,